The Netherlands Enforces Stricter Measures Against False Self-Employment
New Stardom | Work in NL
The Dutch government has officially lifted its enforcement moratorium on the Deregulation of the Assessment of Employment Relationships (DBA) Act, intensifying efforts to combat false self-employment. The move, aimed at ensuring that individuals operating under the guise of self-employment but functioning as employees are correctly classified, is framed as a way to safeguard labor rights and ensure proper tax contributions. However, whether this initiative will achieve its intended goals or create unintended consequences remains to be seen. Some experts warn that stricter regulations could harm genuine freelancers, particularly those in creative industries or specialized fields that rely on flexible contracts.
The Deregulation of the Assessment of Employment Relationships (DBA) Act was introduced in 2016 to clarify the distinction between genuine freelancers and employees misclassified as self-employed. Dutch policymakers are considering various approaches to address the growing crisis. We explore the key drivers behind this shift in our article on how demographic changes are transforming Dutch work culture.
Understanding False Self-Employment
False self-employment occurs when individuals are engaged as self-employed professionals (zzp'ers) but, in practice, work under conditions akin to regular employees, such as fixed working hours and hierarchical supervision. This misclassification can lead to evasion of payroll taxes and denial of employee benefits. While the government argues that this enforcement will restore fairness in the labor market, there is ongoing debate about how accurately authorities will be able to distinguish between genuinely self-employed individuals and those misclassified as freelancers by companies looking to avoid employer obligations.
Government's Enforcement Strategy
The Dutch Tax Authority now actively enforces regulations against false self-employment. Employers found to have misclassified workers may face correction obligations, additional tax assessments, and fines. A one-year transition period is in place, during which no punitive penalties will be imposed if employers demonstrate efforts to address potential false self-employment. Still, questions remain about how effectively these policies will be implemented and whether they will create additional barriers for companies and workers who rely on flexible work structures.
Historical Context: Growth of Self-Employment
Photo by Daniel Thomas
The Netherlands has seen a significant rise in self-employment over the past decades. In 2012, nearly one in five employees were flex workers. By 2022, the number of self-employed workers reached approximately 1.38 million, with the majority operating without employees. While these figures suggest a shift toward independent work, the government sees a need to regulate the landscape more tightly. Whether this approach will strengthen worker protections or limit opportunities for genuine self-employed professionals remains a key question.
Current Trends: Shift Towards Permanent Employment
Recent data indicates that over 42% of Dutch businesses that hired freelancers in 2024 plan to reduce such engagements in 2025, primarily due to stricter enforcement against false self-employment. This trend suggests a shift towards more permanent employment structures as companies adapt to regulatory changes. However, this does not necessarily mean that all freelancers previously misclassified as self-employed will transition smoothly into traditional employment. There is concern that some businesses will outsource work to international contractors rather than hire local talent under stricter regulations, potentially undermining the policy’s effectiveness.
Implications for Businesses and Freelancers
Businesses must reassess their engagements with freelancers to ensure compliance with the clarified criteria distinguishing genuine self-employment from employment relationships. Failure to comply may result in additional tax assessments and fines. Meanwhile, freelancers who depend on their independence, whether for creative work, consulting, or digital services, may find it harder to operate under the new rules. While the government intends to protect workers from precarious labor conditions, the actual impact on freelance-driven industries and innovation remains uncertain.
The Dutch government's enforcement of measures against false self-employment underscores its commitment to fair labor practices. However, whether this initiative will benefit the labor market as intended or create unintended harm for freelancers and businesses alike remains a topic of debate. Policymakers will need to closely monitor the effects of these changes to ensure they do not inadvertently stifle independent work and entrepreneurship in the Netherlands. For the latest insights on labor laws and employment trends, keep reading New Stardom.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information based on official sources. It does not constitute legal, financial, or insurance advice. Readers should verify details with relevant authorities or professionals before making decisions.
If you found this article interesting, subscribe for The Monthly Roundup newsletter, cross-checked, and hand-curated by humans.
Have insights on work and the future of work? Submit an opinion piece to New Stardom. Love work and career books? Explore our fun workplace book collection.
New Stardom is an independent magazine covering the Future of Work, AI, and emerging job trends. Stay informed and explore more on New Stardom.
